宋琨,阮迪,吕泓霖,韩璐阳,黄海峰
SONG Kun,RUAN Di,LYU Honglin,HAN Luyang,HUANG Haifeng

• 1:三峡大学防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室
• 2:三峡大学湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测站

摘要(Abstract)：

滑坡失稳运动的动力学过程及影响范围对滑坡灾害的风险区划分和防控具有重要影响。为了能准确且系统地分析滑坡失稳运动过程中的动力特性变化，对三峡库区湖北省秭归县盐关滑坡失稳运动过程详细调查分析，通过滑带土的室内环剪试验获得其残余强度变化规律及不同剪切速率的滑带土运动参数。采用适用于大变形模拟计算的物质点法(MPM)，再现了盐关滑坡的2次运动堆积过程，并分析了滑坡运动过程中的速度、能量、冲击力等动力特性的动态变化与阶段特征。结果表明，盐关滑坡物质点法(MPM)模拟结果与现场勘测运动距离和滑坡堆积形态相吻合；滑坡2次运动过程均经历失稳启动、加速滑动、减速堆积和停止4个阶段；第一、二次滑动分别在第10、31 s时达到了1.9、3.2 m/s的速度峰值，总动能为1.57×107、1.60×108 J，冲击力峰值为7.82×103、3.87×104 kN；滑坡平均速度、总动能及最大冲击力均随滑距增加呈现先增加后减小的变化趋势。物质点法应用于滑坡动力学分析取得较好的效果，室内环剪试验获取的控制滑坡运动的滑带土残余摩擦系数为物质点法模拟计算提供了可靠的数据支撑。滑坡失稳运动过程的动力学特征在滑坡灾害范围和危害程度预测及风险评价中具有重要意义。
The dynamic process and influence range of instability-induced landslide movement have important effects on the risk area division and prevention of landslide hazards. To accurately and systematically analyze the changes in the dynamic characteristics of landsides during their instability-induced movement, this study thoroughly investigated and analyzed the instability-induced movement process of the Yanguan landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, Zigui County, Hubei Province. Through laboratory ring shear tests, this study determined the changing pattern of residual strength and the motion parameters of sliding zone soil under different shear rates. Accordingly, using the material point method(MPM), which is suitable for the simulation calculation of large deformations, this study reproduced two movement and accumulation processes of the Yanguan landslide. Furthermore, it analyzed the dynamic changes and staged characteristics(e.g., velocity, energy, and impact force) of the dynamic characteristics in the process of landslide movement. The results show that(1) The simulation results of the Yanguan landslide obtained using the MPM are consistent with the movement distances and deposit morphologies determined through field investigation.(2) Each movement process of the landslide can be divided into four stages: instability initiation, accelerated sliding, decelerated accumulation,and steady stop.(3) During the first and second sliding events, the peak velocities reached 1.9 m/s at 10 s and 3.2 m/s at31 s, respectively, the total kinetic energy was 1.57×10~7 J and 1.60×10~8 J, respectively, and the peak impact forces were7.82×10~3 kN and 3.87×10~4 kN, respectively.(4) The average velocity, total kinetic energy, and maximum impact force of the landslide increased first and then decreased with an increase in the sliding distance. The results indicated that the MPM yielded encouraging results in the dynamic analysis of the landslide. Furthermore, the laboratory ring shear tests determined the sliding zone soil's residual friction coefficient, which controls the landslide movement, providing reliable data for the MPM-based simulation calculation. The dynamic characteristics of the instability-induced landslide movement are of great significance for the scope and degree prediction and risk assessment of landslide hazards.

关键词(KeyWords)： 滑坡运动;动力特性;环剪试验;物质点法;盐关滑坡
landslide movement;dynamic characteristics;ring shear test;material point method(MPM);Yanguan landslide

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(42077239)

作者(Author): 宋琨,阮迪,吕泓霖,韩璐阳,黄海峰
SONG Kun,RUAN Di,LYU Honglin,HAN Luyang,HUANG Haifeng

参考文献(References)：

• [1]李晓，张年学，盛祝平，等.武隆鸡尾山滑坡发生机制与裂缝成因分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2020,39(1):1-12.LI Xiao,ZHANG Nianxue,SHENG Zhuping,et al.Sliding mechanisms and fracture genesis of Jiweishan landslide in Wulong[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2020,39(1):1-12.
• [2]HE Kun,MA Guotao,HU Xiewen.Formation mechanisms and evolution model of the tectonic-related ancient giant basalt landslide in Yanyuan County,China[J].Natural Hazards,2021,106(3):2575-2597.
• [3]孔维伟，赵其华，韩俊，等.台风滑坡变形破坏机制模型试验研究[J].工程地质学报，2013,21(2):297-303.KONG Weiwei,ZHAO Qihua,HAN Jun,et al.Model experiments for deformation and failure mechanism of typhoon induced landslide[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2013,21(2):297-303.
• [4]KUSUMOTO T,NAKASE Y,FUJIMOTO M,et al.A study of landslide reaching distance in case analysis by statisticalmethod[J].Journal of the Japan Landslide Society,2006,43(1):1-8.
• [5]ZHANG Zonglin,ZENG Runqiang,MENG Xingmin,et al.Estimating landslide sliding distance based on an improved Heim sled model[J].Catena,2021,204:105401.
• [6]SMITH A,DIXON N.Quantification of landslide velocity from active waveguide generated acoustic emission[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2015,52(4):413-425.
• [7]秦云，姜清辉，郭慧黎.滑坡速度预测的计算方法探讨[J].岩土力学，2008,29(增刊1):373-378.QIN Yun,JIANG Qinghui,GUO Huili.Discussion on two methods for predicting velocity of landslides[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2008,29(Sup.1):373-378.
• [8]唐朝晖，余小龙，柴波，等.顺层岩质滑坡渐进破坏进入加速的能量学判据[J].地球科学，2021,46(11):4033-4042.TANG Zhaohui,YU Xiaolong,CHAI Bo,et al.Energetic criterion of entering acceleration in progressive failure process of bedding rockslide:A case study for Shanshucao landslide[J].Earth Science,2021,46(11):4033-4042.
• [9]GIOFFRE D,MANDAGLIO M C,DI PRISCO C,et al.Evaluation of rapid landslide impact forces against sheltering structures[J].Rivista Italiana Di Geotecnica,2017,51(3):64-76.
• [10]李德营，徐勇，殷坤龙，等.降雨型滑坡高速运动与堆积特征模拟研究：以宁乡县王家湾滑坡为例[J].地质科技情报，2019,38(4):225-230.LI Deying,XU Yong,YIN Kunlong,et al.Simulation of high-speed movement and accumulation characteristics of rainfall-induced landslide:A case of Wangjiawan landslide in Ningxiang County[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2019,38(4):225-230.
• [11]殷跃平，王猛，李滨，等.汶川地震大光包滑坡动力响应特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2012,31(10):1969-1982.YIN Yueping,WANG Meng,LI Bin,et al.Dynamic response characteristics of Daguangbao landslide triggered by Wenchuan earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics&Engineering,2012,31(10):1969-1982.
• [12]赵永红，王航，邓凯，等.三峡树坪滑坡动力学的有限元模拟[J].岩石学报，2016,32(7):2217-2224.ZHAO Yonghong,WANG Hang,DENG Kai,et al.A finite element numerical simulation of landslide dynamics in Shuping,Three Gorges area[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2016,32(7):2217-2224.
• [13]闫晓娟.堆积层滑坡破坏机理及宏观动力特征研究：以勉县土关铺滑坡为例[D].西安：西安科技大学，2020.YAN Xiaojuan.Study on the failure mechanism and dynamic characteristics of accumulation landslides in Southern Shaanxi:Taking Tuguanpu landslide as an example[D].Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2020.
• [14]QIU Liuchao,JIN Feng,LIN Pengzhi,et al.Numerical simulation of submarine landslide tsunamis using particle based methods[J].Journal of Hydrodynamics,2017,29(4):542-551.
• [15]MAZZANTI P,BOZZANO F.Revisiting the February 6th 1783Scilla (Calabria,Italy) landslide and tsunami by numerical simulation[J].Marine Geophysical Research,2011,32(1/2):273-286.
• [16]谢艳芳，李新坡，赵曙熙，等.基于物质点法的新磨村滑坡动力特性分析[J].山地学报，2018,36(4):589-597.XIE Yanfang,LI Xinpo,ZHAO Shuxi,et al.MPM-based numerical analysis of the kinematic characteristics of Xinmo landslide in Maoxian County,Sichuan,China[J].Mountain Research,2018,36(4):589-597.
• [17]张巍，史卜涛，施斌，等.土质滑坡运动全过程物质点法模拟及其应用[J].工程地质学报，2017,25(3):815-823.ZHANG Wei,SHI Butao,SHI Bin,et al.Material point method for run-out process simulation of soil landslides and application[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2017,25(3):815-823.
• [18]LLANO-SERNA M A,FARIAS M M,PEDROSO D M.An assessment of the material point method for modelling large scale run-out processes in landslides[J].Landslides,2016,13(5):1057-1066.
• [19]HE Manchao,SOUSA L R,MULLER A,et al.Numerical and safety considerations about the Daguangbao landslide induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2019,11(5):1019-1035.
• [20]MAST C M,ARDUINO P,MILLER G R,et al.Avalanche and landslide simulation using the material point method:Flow dynamics and force interaction with structures[J].Computational Geosciences,2014,18(5):817-830.
• [21]RECHES Z,LOCKNER D A.Fault weakening and earthquake instability by powder lubrication[J].Nature,2010,467:452-455.
• [22]黄鹏，张雄，马上，等.基于OpenMP的三维显式物质点法并行化研究[J].计算力学学报，2010,27(1):21-27.HUANG Peng,ZHANG Xiong,MA Shang,et al.Parallelization of 3D explicit material point method using OpenMP[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2010,27(1):21-27.

文章评论(Comment)：